View Full Version : What position will the Jets draft in 1st, not who u want.
DennyCrane
04-14-2009, 12:48 PM
What position will the Jets draft in the first round, but
not who you want them to.
I think it will be a WR. They may even package the 1st and 2nd
which according to articles i have read the value chart brings
them up to a 10th pick. I think Ryan is finished with the defense
and will look at the offense in the early rounds.
Remember not who you want them to pick.
jetsmets
04-14-2009, 01:03 PM
What position will the Jets draft in the first round, but
not who you want them to.
I think it will be a WR. They may even package the 1st and 2nd
which according to articles i have read the value chart brings
them up to a 10th pick. I think Ryan is finished with the defense
and will look at the offense in the early rounds.
Remember not who you want them to pick.
It's tough to call. I think it will be the best player available at 17 on the Jets draft chart. But trust me, if the Jets move up in the draft from 17- it is only to grab a QB. Otherwise it will be foolish.
mc33855p
04-14-2009, 01:23 PM
It's tough to call. I think it will be the best player available at 17 on the Jets draft chart. But trust me, if the Jets move up in the draft from 17- it is only to grab a QB. Otherwise it will be foolish.
It is indeed a very tough call. When Rex Ryan was in Baltimore they typically picked defensive players and made that defense what it is today. If the Jets do not move I believe they will either pull the trigger on Percy Harvin or take the best defensive player available in particular a corner like Vontae Davis or a versatile DB such as Malcolm Jenkis who would be a great value pick. The knock on drafting Harvin is he would be a huge special team guy and I don't know if he could be a #2 reciever. Heyward-Bey is a combine warrior with not so hot stats to back him up, so I do not think Rex Ryan would be pulling for him over one of those two DB's I just mentioned. Also, the Jets seem to be interested a Running Back to compliment Thomas Jones and eventually suceed him (such as a Beenie Wells, Knownshen Moreno or LaSean McCoy). I think that Ryan's defensive mind will take one of those DB's if they are available, maybe think about taking a Meauluga(kind of like a Ray Lewis + Ed Hartwell combo they had going), Cushing or Everette Brown if availble and then possibly take a offensive weapon. I do not think the Jets are sold on the offensive talent they will see in the middle of the first round. Thats pretty much my estimate for their thinking in the 1st round. J E T S -MC
The Green Titan
04-14-2009, 01:26 PM
The Jets are not going to move up in the draft for a wide receiver that's an unknown. Do you know that the biggest risk reward is in the top 10. In the top 10 of the 2006 draft, 6 were busts. There was only 9 total busts in the top 32 picks (I use 2006 as a year because it said in the data that I was reading that it takes 3 years to analyze the effectiveness of a draftee).
Anyhow, I'm convinced that the Jets are going to go with the QB's we have. So, either a wide receiver seeing as how they are no longer interested in Miles Austin or a tight end.
I want a wide receiver. But I think they will go with Pettigrew if he is available at 17. So TE is my pick.
mc33855p
04-14-2009, 01:44 PM
The Jets are not going to move up in the draft for a wide receiver that's an unknown. Do you know that the biggest risk reward is in the top 10. In the top 10 of the 2006 draft, 6 were busts. There was only 9 total busts in the top 32 picks (I use 2006 as a year because it said in the data that I was reading that it takes 3 years to analyze the effectiveness of a draftee).
Anyhow, I'm convinced that the Jets are going to go with the QB's we have. So, either a wide receiver seeing as how they are no longer interested in Miles Austin or a tight end.
I want a wide receiver. But I think they will go with Pettigrew if he is available at 17. So TE is my pick.
I will be so mad if they pick Pettigrew at 17. But in the spirit of the thread, any reasoning why you think that is the way they go? Is that truly a need?
The Green Titan
04-14-2009, 02:14 PM
I'm not from Oklahoma, but I've lived here for a couple of years. There's no NFL team to watch unless you're in to Dallas or Kansas (vomit). So I have been able to watch Pettigrew for his entire college career and he is an excellent TE, very versatile. He can block as well as he can catch and catch as well as any receiver in the short pass area. He has the sort of size that will create a lot of mismatches.
When Ryan talks about receivers he always talks about Clowney. Whether we think it or not, Ryan seems to think he has a dangerous receiver in Clowney. Does this mean that they'll dismiss the ability to pick up another receiver in the draft. No, but they won't move up for one either.
What's most important to Ryan - an offense that doesn't turn the ball over (he has said this specifically). A rookie deep threat receiver and a rookie QB are not like bread and butter. They are more like salt and ice cream. The offense that we ran last year will be very similar to the one we run this year, the exception being that Leon will be more involved. So we run more. But we can't just run it, and we don't have the weapons to unleash it down the field. So we'll run and short pass most of the game. A TE that can provide a security blanket for the rookie QB is more effective than a deep threat receiver.
The short passing game works. We proved that last year. We put more points on the board than any other year bar one. It was our defense that lost the game, specifically our secondary. Does our defense look better now. It does on paper. Let's see how it does on the field.
I've said this every time. I won't be upset with a wide receiver but my gut tells me TE,and I won't be upset with that either. And this is the only year I can remember where I'm okay with a TE.
Another gut feeling: The Jets are going to unload a player to get another draft pick. Don't know who yet but it might be our trick play WR. Man I hope they stop running those plays :-)
mc33855p
04-14-2009, 02:40 PM
Very well put. But why draft him when you have Keller? I know your answer will be blocking but we have 3 other TE's on the roster and I guarantee one of them is specifically there for blocking. Also, towards the end of the season I remember it being a lot more with "Broadway" Brett turning the ball over a lot. Schottenheimer has to also change his scheme a lot next year due to exactly what you said a young QB and young WR does not mix. Ryan is gonna want Schottenheimer to run it down teams throat and eat up clock. What I have also been hearing in reference to you talking about a deal is that for example they are only looking for a 2nd round pick for Chad Johnson. What you think about giving up a 2nd round pick for one of the big names out there like Chad Johnson, Braylon Edwards or maybe even Anquan Boldin? What would you think if it was a 1st round pick for any of those three?
frogstomp
04-14-2009, 05:44 PM
Why would we go DB? It makes less sense than TE... we have two pro bowl >30 corners. Then we have a rookie coming off of a solid first year. Doesn't make sense to go corner.
I think Ryan talking about Clowney is just talking about him as another weapon. Show me one place where he makes a remark saying like he thinks Clowney is a 1 or a 2.
I would put my money on WR, but with the draft, you never know who will fall.
As for DHB being a workout warrior without the stats to back him up, how can you say that and then come back and say we draft Harvin? DHB has more collegiate receiving yards and the same amount of TD receptions while playing on a much worse offense... I mean, if you want to make the argument that we wouldn't go with DHB because of his stats, Harvin makes even less sense. You're arguing against yourself.
If Maclin falls we'll take him. If he doesn't, I'm going to say DHB.
The Green Titan
04-14-2009, 06:01 PM
I think Ryan talking about Clowney is just talking about him as another weapon. Show me one place where he makes a remark saying like he thinks Clowney is a 1 or a 2.
You know they won't make specific statements like that. Man I can't wait until it's all over.
frogstomp
04-14-2009, 06:08 PM
You know they won't make specific statements like that. Man I can't wait until it's all over.
No, I mean, I have actually seen very FEW statements about Clowney, and that was just Rex making generic quotes. Nothing to make it seem like we actually thought he would start.
I would like to see all of these times where Rex has been talking about Clowney.
The Green Titan
04-14-2009, 06:12 PM
No, I mean, I have actually seen very FEW statements about Clowney, and that was just Rex making generic quotes. Nothing to make it seem like we actually thought he would start.
I would like to see all of these times where Rex has been talking about Clowney.
Well good luck with your internet search. I'm not your secretary. And seeing how many people you get into disagreements on here with ,I'm not taking the bait. There are people on here I ACTUALLY enjoy talking to. You're just not one of them :-)
frogstomp
04-14-2009, 06:17 PM
Well good luck with your internet search. I'm not your secretary. And seeing how many people you get into disagreements on here with ,I'm not taking the bait. There are people on here I ACTUALLY enjoy talking to. You're just not one of them :-)
So, in other words, you'll bring up something in an argument to support your own side, and when someone is generally interested in it, you won't post it?
In fact, you'll go a step further and try to insult me? Legitimate moderating. :-)
The Green Titan
04-14-2009, 06:23 PM
So, in other words, you'll bring up something in an argument to support your own side, and when someone is generally interested in it, you won't post it?
In fact, you'll go a step further and try to insult me? Legitimate moderating. :-)
It's not an insult to say I'm not a fan of yours or that I don't enjoy discussions with you. That's just a fact. Not everyone has to like you. I wouldn't take it personally. Sorry if that offends you but it's not my intention. I'm sure there are people on here that don't like me. I'm okay with that :-)
frogstomp
04-14-2009, 06:30 PM
It's not an insult to say I'm not a fan of yours or that I don't enjoy discussions with you. That's just a fact. Not everyone has to like you. I wouldn't take it personally. Sorry if that offends you but it's not my intention. I'm sure there are people on here that don't like me. I'm okay with that :-)
Ha, joke. I may get into arguments randomly, but that's because I simply state what I think. I'm not two faced, nor do I try getting involved in arguments that I am not a part of.
As for you not liking me, I've know that for a while, and been indifferent. I was just pointing out that there are much classier ways to moderate.
But I'm done with this little aside. If you don't want to show these secret Clowney notes you have, which I was asking about since I was interested in reading about what Rex had to say on our players, then don't. But why bring them up to support your argument, then?
Hm...
The Green Titan
04-14-2009, 06:30 PM
And it's not that I don't want to show you the comments it's that I can't. I'm sure i could find one or two but they are comments that I've heard on tv shows or on hundreds of sites that I use to get information on the web. I also get a lot of my information from Erik Boland. He writes about the Jets and I have the opportunity to pick his brain from time to time. I got the Clowney rap sheat from him more recently.
Like I said, I don't appreciate your style. There are a lot of people on here who enjoy your participation and that should be good enough for you. As for my moderating skills, well there's about 1654 members and you're the only one that's ever complained about me, so I'm not worried. If you yourself had not been written up for misconduct or violations of the terms of use for the forum, I might listen to you. But you were, so I won't.
frogstomp
04-14-2009, 06:45 PM
If you yourself had not been written up for misconduct or violations of the terms of use for the forum, I might listen to you. But you were, so I won't.
:rolleyes:
I was once, because you misinterpreted one of my posts. But hey, you're right, since at one point I may have said something insulting towards another member on a forum, my opinion is no longer valid.
It's tough living in this 21st century world.
As for people enjoying my participation, that's not important to me. I'm here to have a place to discuss the Jets, seeing as I don't live in an area with many other Jets fans. I'm not here to get as many cool kid followers as I can. In fact, I'm sure most people here dislike me, because I've probably argued with one of them at one point or another. And, sadly, a lot of people take message boards faaaar too seriously, and get insulted when someone disagrees with them.
Anyways, frogstomp do what frogstomp do. Fo sho.
The Green Titan
04-14-2009, 06:48 PM
:rolleyes:
I was once, because you misinterpreted one of my posts. But hey, you're right, since at one point I may have said something insulting towards another member on a forum, my opinion is no longer valid.
It's tough living in this 21st century world.
As for people enjoying my participation, that's not important to me. I'm here to have a place to discuss the Jets, seeing as I don't live in an area with many other Jets fans. I'm not here to get as many cool kid followers as I can. In fact, I'm sure most people here dislike me, because I've probably argued with one of them at one point or another. And, sadly, a lot of people take message boards faaaar too seriously, and get insulted when someone disagrees with them.
Anyways, frogstomp do what frogstomp do. Fo sho.
Actually it was the two other moderators who felt you were out of line for insulting another member. I was just the axe man :-)
frogstomp
04-14-2009, 06:56 PM
*Shrug*
"Once a criminal, always a criminal".
DomUK
04-14-2009, 07:11 PM
Sir Dom Youkay has been appointed by the UN as peacekeeper.
ok chill the [blank] out you two.
i don't think either of you would disagree with me if i said that you two a probably the two most opinionated and straight talking people on this forum. yet you're also two of the best informed and interesting members, its great to read your posts, both of you.
so how about we put the handbags away ladies and lets get back on track eh?
The Green Titan
04-14-2009, 07:13 PM
Sir Dom Youkay has been appointed by the UN as peacekeeper.
ok chill the [blank] out you two.
i don't think either of you would disagree with me if i said that you two a probably the two most opinionated and straight talking people on this forum. yet you're also two of the best informed and interesting members, its great to read your posts, both of you.
so how about we put the handbags away ladies and lets get back on track eh?
You are like extra funny today. I'm really enjoying it :-)
mc33855p
04-14-2009, 07:18 PM
Why would we go DB? It makes less sense than TE... we have two pro bowl >30 corners. Then we have a rookie coming off of a solid first year. Doesn't make sense to go corner.
I think Ryan talking about Clowney is just talking about him as another weapon. Show me one place where he makes a remark saying like he thinks Clowney is a 1 or a 2.
I would put my money on WR, but with the draft, you never know who will fall.
As for DHB being a workout warrior without the stats to back him up, how can you say that and then come back and say we draft Harvin? DHB has more collegiate receiving yards and the same amount of TD receptions while playing on a much worse offense... I mean, if you want to make the argument that we wouldn't go with DHB because of his stats, Harvin makes even less sense. You're arguing against yourself.
If Maclin falls we'll take him. If he doesn't, I'm going to say DHB.
Actually Percy Harvin had 17 touchdowns and about 1300 all purpose yards so your right... Also, DB would make a lot of sense than you think. Malcolm Jennings specifically because of his versatility and what they could do with him playing both corner and safety(learn that good ol' Rex defense from Leonhard). DHB is fast as lightning do not get me wrong, but BUST potential. You know I do keep forgetting we have Lito Shepard, But I still think that a DB like Jenkins would be better than Pettigrew. What I mean with Harvin also by the way is if Maclin and Crabtree are off the board which they will, who is the next best reciever? I would like to think Harvin over DHB. And just looked up DHB's stats, you should look them over again because Harvin had more total TD's this year alone missing some games than DHB had in his career. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=169167 - Actually I did the work for you check it out. J E T S -MC
mc33855p
04-14-2009, 07:22 PM
It's not an insult to say I'm not a fan of yours or that I don't enjoy discussions with you. That's just a fact. Not everyone has to like you. I wouldn't take it personally. Sorry if that offends you but it's not my intention. I'm sure there are people on here that don't like me. I'm okay with that :-)
I actually enjoy our back and forth since I started up with this. I don't live with my brother any more and the lone other Jets fan in my Townhouse up at school graduated so I enjoy a little anger about how the Jets are supposed to make their pick hahahah. I mean come on anyway, I've learned from a long line of Jets fans in my fam that a lot of the time we are Jets fan are miserable. But we sure do rock Jets Stadium.
The Green Titan
04-14-2009, 07:25 PM
I actually enjoy our back and forth since I started up with this. I don't live with my brother any more and the lone other Jets fan in my Townhouse up at school graduated so I enjoy a little anger about how the Jets are supposed to make their pick hahahah. I mean come on anyway, I've learned from a long line of Jets fans in my fam that a lot of the time we are Jets fan are miserable. But we sure do rock Jets Stadium.
Darn it you're right. I've been tainted by the misery of being a Jet fan :-)
Please tell me this is the year that all ends?????
frogstomp
04-14-2009, 07:30 PM
And just looked up DHB's stats, you should look them over again because Harvin had more total TD's this year alone missing some games than DHB had in his career. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=169167 - Actually I did the work for you check it out. J E T S -MC
When I'm drafting a receiver, I'm not looking at their rushing TD's.
They both had 13 career receiving TD's. And Harvin is in a MUCH better offense, with a much better quarterback.
DomUK
04-14-2009, 07:36 PM
Darn it you're right. I've been tainted by the misery of being a Jet fan :-)
Please tell me this is the year that all ends?????
it never ends...
JFMS (Jet Fan Misery Syndrome) is a mental disorder which randomly affects people but it is prominent in the New York and New Jersey areas.
Once the syndrome develops fully the victim will feel an unnatural desire to put themselves through misery and dissapointment until either they die or the ancient curse of Namath is broken.
Legend has it that one man will defy all odds and take the Jets to a SuperBowl victory and only when this has been achieved will the curse be broken. They call this man the Messiah or Head Coach - we know him simply as Rex Ryan...
but (i dont where i'm getting this from) Ryan cannot complete this quest alone, fate has landed him with the perfect companion on this quest into the unknown, this young man - Brett Ratliff - is the key to Rex's success and the cure to JFMS...
The Green Titan
04-14-2009, 07:38 PM
Dom, I am laughing my butt off. Are you on some sort of pill.
I love how everything ends with Ratliff.
DomUK
04-14-2009, 07:51 PM
Dom, I am laughing my butt off. Are you on some sort of pill.
I love how everything ends with Ratliff.
no i'm not and thats the worst part lol
and it doesn't "end" with Ratliff.
Ratliff is the start, middle and end. :D
greenandwhite
04-15-2009, 02:17 PM
it never ends...
JFMS (Jet Fan Misery Syndrome) is a mental disorder which randomly affects people but it is prominent in the New York and New Jersey areas.
Once the syndrome develops fully the victim will feel an unnatural desire to put themselves through misery and dissapointment until either they die or the ancient curse of Namath is broken.
Legend has it that one man will defy all odds and take the Jets to a SuperBowl victory and only when this has been achieved will the curse be broken. They call this man the Messiah or Head Coach - we know him simply as Rex Ryan...
but (i dont where i'm getting this from) Ryan cannot complete this quest alone, fate has landed him with the perfect companion on this quest into the unknown, this young man - Brett Ratliff - is the key to Rex's success and the cure to JFMS...
lol is that the Ratliff prophecy?
DomUK
04-15-2009, 07:06 PM
lol is that the Ratliff prophecy?
yeah i'm a high priest of Ratliffism
Otannenbaum
04-15-2009, 07:13 PM
Guys, you can draft, trade and acquire all the defense that you want. However, if you have no offense (one that can actually score points), I don't give a how GOOD your defense is, you WILL NOT win games!
Otannenbaum
04-15-2009, 08:05 PM
There was a tale that was told to me long ago. This whole tale was a “crossroads” type of story that involved a Super Bowl III QB and an individual by the name of Lou Cypher.
It seems that the two parties entered into contract whereby the QB would receive fame and fortune and the second party would obtain something inanimate that rhymes with the word “toll”. Now the rub to all of this is that the team that the QB was on would NEVER win another trophy until the second party collected on his end of the bargain.
Now, this could be the musing of a disgruntled Giants fan or the ranting of a Patriot fanatic. However, the way that it was presented to me had all the trimmings of some sort of maniacal validity to it.
Has anyone else been privy to this Tale from the Crypt?
DomUK
04-15-2009, 08:10 PM
There was a tale that was told to me long ago. This whole tale was a “crossroads” type of story that involved a Super Bowl III QB and an individual by the name of Lou Cypher.
It seems that the two parties entered into contract whereby the QB would receive fame and fortune and the second party would obtain something inanimate that rhymes with the word “toll”. Now the rub to all of this is that the team that the QB was on would NEVER win another trophy until the second party collected on his end of the bargain.
Now, this could be the musing of a disgruntled Giants fan or the ranting of a Patriot fanatic. However, the way that it was presented to me had all the trimmings of some sort of maniacal validity to it.
Has anyone else been privy to this Tale from the Crypt?
my story makes more sense :p
Jetschris
04-15-2009, 08:11 PM
There was a tale that was told to me long ago. This whole tale was a “crossroads” type of story that involved a Super Bowl III QB and an individual by the name of Lou Cypher.
It seems that the two parties entered into contract whereby the QB would receive fame and fortune and the second party would obtain something inanimate that rhymes with the word “toll”. Now the rub to all of this is that the team that the QB was on would NEVER win another trophy until the second party collected on his end of the bargain.
Now, this could be the musing of a disgruntled Giants fan or the ranting of a Patriot fanatic. However, the way that it was presented to me had all the trimmings of some sort of maniacal validity to it.
Has anyone else been privy to this Tale from the Crypt?
ummm, what?
Jets337
04-16-2009, 11:57 AM
ummm, what?
that whole namath sold his soul to the devil thing.
I prefer to think we haven't won a championship since because we weren't good enough. :eek:
unmasked
04-16-2009, 12:12 PM
it never ends...
JFMS (Jet Fan Misery Syndrome) is a mental disorder which randomly affects people but it is prominent in the New York and New Jersey areas.
Is that anything like WHMS in East London?
Anyway, I predict that we will actually trade down.
1. The top WRs and DEs will be gone and we can't and don't want to trade up.
2. We will not draft a high priced WR without having a known entity at QB.
3. We will not draft yet another TE (YATE) in the 1st round.
4. We have the fewest draft picks in the division and will try to pick up more.
jetsfan1115
04-16-2009, 03:05 PM
I feel DomUK is God and just told us the story of our existence. What we have to do is all trust what Ryan does. I think we can get Tyson Jackson at 17 and work from there. second round we can pick up a wr and we'll be on track. Let's hope Ratliff can prove to be our answer to the devil (Patriots).
greenandwhite
04-16-2009, 04:23 PM
that whole namath sold his soul to the devil thing.
I prefer to think we haven't won a championship since because we weren't good enough. :eek:
If this was true, Rex Ryan would have to kill Namath to fulfill his Super Bowl promise:eek:
DomUK
04-16-2009, 09:00 PM
I feel DomUK is God and just told us the story of our existence. What we have to do is all trust what Ryan does. I think we can get Tyson Jackson at 17 and work from there. second round we can pick up a wr and we'll be on track. Let's hope Ratliff can prove to be our answer to the devil (Patriots).
believe what you feel young one
in life there are few things you can be sure of:
Death is one
Ratliff is the other
one is the end....the other is just the beginning of something great - you must decide which one...is which?
The Green Titan
04-16-2009, 09:03 PM
believe what you feel young one
in life there are few things you can be sure of:
Death is one
Ratliff is the other
one is the end....the other is just the beginning of something great - you must decide which one...is which?
This sounds awfully like the red pill blue pill scene from the Matrix. Are you stealing material!
Is Ratliff in the rabbit hole?
DomUK
04-16-2009, 09:36 PM
This sounds awfully like the red pill blue pill scene from the Matrix. Are you stealing material!
Is Ratliff in the rabbit hole?
i just watched SAW IV - the whole 'your fate is your hands you must decide' crap
frogstomp
04-16-2009, 10:42 PM
Is that anything like WHMS in East London?
Anyway, I predict that we will actually trade down.
1. The top WRs and DEs will be gone and we can't and don't want to trade up.
2. We will not draft a high priced WR without having a known entity at QB.
3. We will not draft yet another TE (YATE) in the 1st round.
4. We have the fewest draft picks in the division and will try to pick up more.
It's easy to say we trade down, but someone actually needs to want our pick for us to do it. It depends who is still available at that point. If Sanchez is, it would be easy to trade down. If Sanchez, Maclin, Raji, and all the special players are gone, who will even want to trade up?
Trading down is something that is tough to actually predict until the draft has started, as two teams are required for it to actually work.
The Green Titan
04-17-2009, 12:10 AM
Meanwhile, Ryan praised WR David Clowney, saying, "He was impressive today. Everybody knows about the great speed. I like his confidence. He loves to compete. He runs good routes. I'm excited about him."
http://www.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/2009/04/new_york_jets_coach_rex_ryan_s_1.html
Umm, what was your question again.
Note to members, I decided to release one of my secret messages on Ryan's comments about Clowney. This is it :-)
The Green Titan
04-17-2009, 12:22 AM
Someone asked to see where Rex Ryan was complimenting Clowney. So I post a quote made today as a matter of fact. Still not good enough for some people I guess. Always going to find a way to make them selves look smarter than the rest of us.
The Green Titan
04-17-2009, 12:27 AM
Well, with some of you it is easy.
Seeing right through you is easier. Business expert? You? I own my own company. Next time I need advice from a sports store manager on business I'll head to a sports store. Now thats funny.
The Green Titan
04-17-2009, 12:32 AM
My internet persona is made up of:
4/10's smarter than you
3/10's cockiness
2/10's transparency
1/10 love for Elisha Cuthbert.
I think I'm achieving what I am going for.
Hmm,
Own my own business
Own my own house
Own my own car
Serve my country by serving in the military
I'm not sure that I need to compete with you for anything.
The Green Titan
04-17-2009, 12:36 AM
That's sweet. Let's bring up personal achievements and then go on about how we don't need to compete.
Insecure much?
Insecurity is usually the trait of a teenager. How old are you again?
Although I've met some really cool ones on here that are nothing like you.
DomUK
04-17-2009, 02:25 PM
Well, with some of you it is easy.
"i've never insulted anyone blahblahblah"
"well...well.... you're still wrong"
"its right because.....i said so"
give it a rest -
i dont have any beef with you but seriously reading your posts is not an enjoyable experience.
you may now tell me how little you care and how you're happy to upset people to voice your opi-blahblahblah!
change the record already mate
jetsfan1115
04-17-2009, 07:44 PM
"i've never insulted anyone blahblahblah"
"well...well.... you're still wrong"
"its right because.....i said so"
give it a rest -
i dont have any beef with you but seriously reading your posts is not an enjoyable experience.
you may now tell me how little you care and how you're happy to upset people to voice your opi-blahblahblah!
change the record already mate
As I said before... DomUK is God =]
Ok... getting bad to the topic
I think we should draft a WR. Reports have said that Clemens is doing a great job as a QB and can be our man, but look at our recieving corps... Cotchery is a good #2 and i guess he could be our #1 but then stuckey, smith, clowney... I mean look at Kurt Warner, he was barely making it in the NFL but then they set him up with some great recievers (boldin, fitzgerald, breaston) and at him now. A QB can't do it all by himself, someone has to be on the other side of the field to catch the ball and the recievers we have now just arent good enough. I mean it's possible that clowney, smith... are actually incredible but i mean what are the chances of that.
Jets337
04-17-2009, 11:04 PM
Ok... getting bad to the topic
I think we should draft a WR. Reports have said that Clemens is doing a great job as a QB and can be our man, but look at our recieving corps... Cotchery is a good #2 and i guess he could be our #1 but then stuckey, smith, clowney... I mean look at Kurt Warner, he was barely making it in the NFL but then they set him up with some great recievers (boldin, fitzgerald, breaston) and at him now. A QB can't do it all by himself, someone has to be on the other side of the field to catch the ball and the recievers we have now just arent good enough. I mean it's possible that clowney, smith... are actually incredible but i mean what are the chances of that.
You have my deep respect for bringing this thing back on topic! I nominate you for poster of the week. Since I'm the only voting, you automatically win!
You make a great point. We are missing that one receiver that makes the rest better. Keyshawn and Chrebet complimented each other well, despite the fact that neither had great speed. JC will be our #1 for better or worse. Unless we trade for a Boldin type guy, or draft, we are going to have to hope that Clowney, or Stuckey rise to the type. we also have a guy named Marcus Henry that the previous regime was very high on. I don't think he has seen any playing time though. Will be an interesting week leading up to the draft.
jetsfan1115
04-18-2009, 09:42 PM
I think that we need to shore up our front lines a little more though, because lets face it ellis is not young, Coleman isnt good, and Jenkins can't really play every down every game. Faneca and Woody aren't young either. In my opinion the offense doesnt have much, and outside of the top 10, there isn't alot of offensive power off the board (even if we get a great receiver, no one with alot of experience will be throwing to him.) So I think we should take what we can for the defense and work through the draft next year, trades, and free agency.